Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡±â°ø°ú ÀÓ»ó½Ç½ÀÆò°¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ - ÀÓ»ó½Ç½ÀÆò°¡Ç¥ Ç׸ñ±¸¼º³»¿ë°ú ¹èÁ¡À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -

A Study on Evaluation of Clinical Practice of Dept. of Dental Technology - Construction of items and grading of the evaluation table at clinical practice -

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 29±Ç 2È£ p.65 ~ 77
ÀÌÈ­½Ä, ¹èºÀÁø, Àå±âȯ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ­½Ä ( Lee Hwa-Sik ) - ´ë±¸º¸°Ç´ëÇÐ Ä¡±â°ø°ú
¹èºÀÁø ( Bae Bong-Jin ) - ¼Ò¼ÓÈ®ÀÎÁß
Àå±âȯ ( Chang Ki-Whan ) - ¼Ò¼ÓÈ®ÀÎÁß

Abstract


This study is for the purpose of studying the validity of the construction of items and grading of
the evaluation table at clinical practice used as the method of evaluation when clinical practice of
Dept. of Dental Technology.
205 dental technicians in 4 cities were questioned to analyze the relation between items of the evaluation table at clinical practice and its grading. The collected materials were inspected by SAS V8 for Windows.
The results are as follows:
1. Making up all the items and grading seem to be appropriate because they had the marks more
than midium(more than 3.28).
2. Making up detailed items and grading seem to be trusted because they had the marks more
than 3.30.
3.The significance level of the relation between items of the evaluation at clinical practice and its grading by t-inspection is p<0.0001 and so it appears to be meaningful.
4. It proved to be meaningful in result of regression analysis of the influence on the construction of the evaluation at clinical practice and its grading.
With this result, further study is needed for the better methods of the evaluation in its adjustment and graduated grading among the items.

Å°¿öµå

Dept. of dental technology;Clinical practice;Evaluation.

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI